Hillary Clinton the confused. A nursery rhyme.

Hillary Clinton often confused. Who would have thunk?

Check out this Huma Abedin email from  January 26, 2013, containing an exchange with Clinton aide Monica Hanley regarding Clinton’s schedule in which Abedin says Clinton is “often confused:”

  • Abedin: Have you been going over her calls with her? So she knows singh is at 8? [India Prime Minister Manmohan Singh]
  • Hanley: She was in bed for a nap by the time I heard that she had an 8am call. Will go over with her
  • Abedin: Very imp to do that. She’s often confused.

CT8lvcoW4AE5ZGT

Here are 21 questions for Hillary Clinton. I have made them in the form of a nursery rhyme to make the questions age appropriate for the average low information voter. The answers are purely hypothetical, and does assume a candidness, free from lies for which she hitherto has not been known.

 

Hillary, Hillary, where have you been?

“It’s none of your business, for I am the queen.”

Hillary, Hillary, what did you see?

“I saw heads of states so that they would fund me.”

Hillary, Hillary, what did you do?

“No evidence found that there was quid pro quo.”

Hillary, Hillary, what did you say?

“It’s old news by now, won’t you please go away.”

Hillary, Hillary, when did you lie?

“Benghazi for starters, I have a supply.”

Hillary, Hillary, what did you write?

“Deleted my e-mails to give you my spite.”

Hillary, Hillary, why do you run?

“Entitled I am, it’s my turn in the sun.”

Hillary, Hillary, what do you eat?

“Genetically modified food ’til I bleat.”

Hillary, Hillary, what’s with your hair?

“Blond coloring hides I’m an old, graying mare.”

Hillary, Hillary, why did you speak?

“To take all the cash from the poor and the weak.”

Hillary, Hillary, do you love life?

“Not if they’re unborn, abort with a knife.”

Hillary, Hillary, why did you cry?

“I was broke and in debt, it was hard to get by.”

Hillary, Hillary, what was your fee?

“For the students, two millions, I’m cheap, don’t you see?”

Hillary, Hillary, what was the deal?

“Our Uranium to Russia, Bill had a great spiel.”

Hillary, Hillary, why all the lies?

“Maybe, just maybe, I’m Lord of the flies.”

Hillary, Hillary, what’s classified?

“I’ve no idea, I’ve nothing to hide.”

Hillary, Hillary, what is the day?

“Bloody Tuesday it is. I’m a witch. Hip, Hooray!!”

Hillary, Hillary, what’s classified?

“I really don’t know, I have nothing to hide.”

Hillary, Hillary, are you contrite?

“If I say ‘I am Sorry’, it makes all wrongs right.”

Hillary, Hillary, are you for real?

“My focus group gives me that warm, homespun feel.”

Hillary, Hillary, are you confused?

“Often I am, but I’m never amused.”

Verse 66 of the Obama Impeachment song. Obama said: ISIL is contained.

Verse 66 of the Obama Impeachment song. Obama said: ISIL is contained.

In an interview with George Stephanopolous on ABC’s Good Morning America President Barack Obama said: “I don’t think they’re gaining strength. What is true, from the start our goal has been first to contain and we have contained them. They have not gained ground in Iraq and in Syria they’ll come in, they’ll leave.”
That same day the horrendous multiple Islamic terrorist attacks took place in downtown Paris, under maximum terrorist alert, and over 100 innocents were murdered.
Which leads to verse 66 of the Obama Impeachment song (as if sung by Obama to the tune of “Please release me, let me go”)

I said “ISIL is contained”

when they wage Jihad unrestrained.

I maintain “no ground they’ve gained”

I’m father of lies – fit to be caned.

Here is the complete impeachment song: https://lenbilen.com/2015/02/25/the-complete-obama-impeachment-song/

Which is more threatening? The attack in Paris, or Climate Change?

Watching with horror the multiple simultaneous Islamic terrorist attacks on innocent civilians in Paris, France, while Paris was under the highest possible alert for terrorist activities, the French President Hollande among the spectators at a soccer match between France and Germany, and the climate control conference COP21 only two weeks away, the words of President Obama still rings in my ears:

“My definition of leadership would be leading on climate change, an international accord that potentially we’ll get in Paris. My definition of leadership is mobilizing the entire world community to make sure that Iran doesn’t get a nuclear weapon.”

Obama is also quite proud of his milestones on climate change, particularly after reaching a “historic” deal with China in 2014.

“The historic climate change announcements that we made last year in Beijing have encouraged other countries to step up, as well, increasing the prospects for a stronger global agreement this year,” Obama said in September during a meeting with Chinese President Xi at the White House. This historic agreement means that China is allowed to emit six times more CO2 than U.S.A. by the year 2030.

According to a well-researched article by Bjorn Lomborg, peer-reviewed, entitled “Impact of Current Climate Proposals” the predictions of how a total success in implementing all climate mediation recommendations, the result will be:

This article investigates the temperature reduction impact of major climate policy proposals implemented by 2030, using the standard MAGICC climate model. Even optimistically assuming that promised emission cuts are maintained throughout the century, the impacts are generally small.

  • The impact of the US Clean Power Plan (USCPP) is a reduction in temperature rise by 0.013°C by 2100.
  • The full US promise for the COP21 climate conference in Paris, its so-called Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC) will reduce temperature rise by 0.031°C.
  • The EU 20-20 policy has an impact of 0.026°C, the EU INDC 0.053°C, and China INDC 0.048°C.
  • All climate policies by the US, China, the EU and the rest of the world, implemented from the early 2000s to 2030 and sustained through the century will likely reduce global temperature rise about 0.17°C in 2100.

These impact estimates are robust to different calibrations of climate sensitivity, carbon cycling and different climate scenarios. Current climate policy promises will do little to stabilize the climate and their impact will be undetectable for many decades.

Of particular interest is the impact of the US Clean Power Plan (USCPP) with its reduction in temperature rise by 0.013°C by 2100.

How much is 0.013 degrees? It is about as much as the adiabatic cooling of the atmosphere occurring between the feet and the head of an average sized person.

For this Obama is killing our Coal mining, while still calling the China climate agreement a success, allowing them to burn over half of the coal in the world.

And this is the most urgent danger facing us today?

Verse 65 of the Obama Impeachment song. Banning the Box.

Verse 65 of the Obama Impeachment song. Banning the Box.

News item: In an announcement on Monday Nov. 2, President Obama announced that he was “Banning the Box,” removing the checkbox on federal employment applications in which people are required to disclose their criminal backgrounds.  The order known as “ban the box” which describes the actual checkbox on applications that inquires if applicant have ever been convicted of a crime, is intended to help former convicts successfully re-enter into society.
Which leads to verse 65 of the Obama Impeachment song (as if sung by Obama to the tune of “Please release me, let me go”)

Excons, I have banned the box

I need you here to clean their clocks.

My Chicago way still rocks.

Come join me, or I’ll be put in stocks.

Here is the complete impeachment song: https://lenbilen.com/2015/02/25/the-complete-obama-impeachment-song/

Obama rejects the Keystone XL pipeline. A most deplorable decision for the economy and the environment, but good for Warren Buffett,

The President has decided to deny the permission to build the Keystone XL pipeline, thus satisfying the environmentalists that want to wean us off our dependency on carbon based products, such as fuel, food and fertilizer. The arguments for denying the decision are nearly exclusively political, while the arguments to build the pipeline are concerns for our national security and economy.

Here is the deal:

Canada has the tar-sands and is extracting the oil. This was not our decision. If we don’t buy the oil, China will.

We are importing crude oil from the Middle East (Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, etc.), Nigeria, Venezuela and other volatile places, leaving us exposed to supply and price disruptions.

We export refined products to the Caribbean islands, which by the way have a larger carbon footprint per person than the U.S. This is good business, since the islands are too small for a refinery.

It takes more energy to run a refinery up north in a cold climate than in hot, humid Baytown, Texas.

The last time a major oil refinery was built in the U.S was 1976. A small refinery was built in 1993, in Valdez, Alaska. The  US. regulatory climate is hostile to refineries. Colombia, O.K, U.S. No.

Warren Buffett’s bought Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad in February 2010 and paid 44 Billion dollars for it. The railroad paid Berkshire Hathaway 2.25 Billion in dividends during the first 13 months. Warren Buffet bought the railroad after Obama took office.

Right now the crude oil is transported from the Athabasca tar sands to Houston mostly by Warren Buffet’s Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC railroad. It is among U.S. and Canadian railroads that stand to benefit from the Obama administration’s decision to reject TransCanada Corp. (TRP)’s Keystone XL oil pipeline permit.
With modest expansion, railroads can handle all new oil produced in western Canada through 2030, according to an analysis of the Keystone proposal by the U.S. State Department.
https://lenbilen.com/2012/01/25/warren-buffet-profiting-from-working-on-the-railroad/
The cost of transporting the oil is about #14 dollars per barrel, much of it the cost of energy (CO2). The pipe-line can do the job for about seven dollars per barrel, much of it capital costs.
We can see what happens when transporting crude oil: https://lenbilen.com/2013/07/07/ttain-derailment-in-quebec-and-keystone-xl-pipeline-a-limerick/

Warren Buffet is a major player in the Obama Administration; he has frequent access to the White House and is a major contributor to Obama and the Democrats’ campaign.

Sarah Palin succinctly coined the phrase: “This is Crony Capitalism.”

By not importing oil from Canada the total carbon footprint will increase. We lose, and Canada loses. (I am not concerned that the CO2 is increasing, but that a valuable natural resource is excessively depleted.) Now it turns out that Canada has left the Kyoto Protocol, thereby being free to burn as much of its carbon as they want. Was that really what the environmentalists wanted?

So why did Obama deny the permit? Here are five possibilities:

1. Obama is a true believer that ”this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal”. As a true environmentalist his role can not be overestimated .

2. Obama is deliberately wrecking our economy, refuses to have an energy policy that will create jobs, but will support protest movements and foment unrest.

3. Obama is acting on orders from Global Governance people that do want U.S. to be totally dependent on international law and U.N. mandates.

4. Obama wants to show leadership in advance of the Paris Climate Conference 2015, and its associated treaty.

5. Obama wants to show leadership on something, and touts the “breakthrough” agreement with China, where he will allow China to emit six times as much CO2 by the year 2030 as the U.S.

6.  https://lenbilen.com/2014/02/14/the-real-reason-obama-wont-approve-the-keystone-xl-pipeline/

7. Obama promised to be Brazil’s best customer from their deep sea oil drilling success, paid for by U.S. loan guarantees. He must be true to his promises.

8. Obama is half insane and surrounded by bad advisers.

This is the best I can do to explain the reasons for this decision.

Obama is delusional in ridiculing Republicans. A Limerick.

President Barack Obama tore into Republican presidential candidates Monday night at a Democratic fundraising event in New York. Under much laughter from the audience he said:

“Have you noticed that everyone of these candidates say, ‘Obama’s weak. Putin’s kicking sand in his face. When I talk to Putin, he’s going to straighten out,’ Then it turns out they can’t handle a bunch of CNBC moderators at the debate. Let me tell you, if you can’t handle those guys, then I don’t think the Chinese and the Russians are going to be too worried about you,”

PutinObama A top Kremlin official, Dmitri Rogozin tweeted the picture to the left under the heading: “We have different values and allies.”

Check the contrast in this Limerick.

When Putin has leopard, Obama has poodle;

then Palin has everything, kit and kaboodle.

Watch the Grizzly mom act

and the media react.

Obama? He spanks with a noodle.

The picture below is from Governor Palin’s time as Governor.

SarahPalingovernoroffwgrizzlybearruglg

Hillary Clinton: Too big to jail? A Limerick.

Former four-star U.S. Army Gen. David Petraeus was sentenced to two year’s probation and ordered to pay a $100,000 fine as a result of having “leaked” classified national security information to his biographer, Paula Broadwell, who was stripped of her military security clearance after a federal probe alleged she was storing classified military material at her home. What it consisted of was essentially David Petraeus diary, containing his daily appointments and comments, which he stored in his locked desk drawer, an unsecured location. This information he shared with his biographer without first clearing this information.

Hillary Clinton on the other hand stored, sent and received at least 700 classified e-mails on her private, unsecured e-mail server, vulnerable to hacking by foreign governments such as Chins, Russia and Iran.

Is Hillary too big to jail?

In FBI’s eyes she can’t fail.

For her last subterfuge

Let her sentence be huge:

Guantanamo Bay – Post no bail.

Verse 64 of the Obama Impeachment song. Fifty pairs of Boots on the ground in Syria. Who, What, When and Where but not Why.

Verse 64 of the Obama Impeachment song. Fifty pairs of Boots on the ground in Syria. Who, What, When and Where but not Why.

News item: Russian President Vladimir Putin is preparing to send up to 150,000 troops to Syria in a bid to wipe out the evil Islamic State once and for all.
Obama is responding in kind by sending up to 50 special force troops  to Syria to serve as ‘advisers’ without conferring with Congress for authorization.
Which leads to verse 64 of the Obama Impeachment song (as if sung by Obama to the tune of “Please release me, let me go”)

Fifty guys to Syria’s war

I send, but I don’t know what for.

As I expose my special corps

Recruitment for ISIS starts to soar.

Here is the complete impeachment song: https://lenbilen.com/2015/02/25/the-complete-obama-impeachment-song/

Ode to Sarah Palin. The campaign song.

(Best sung to “This ole house” by Stuart Hamblen.)

Sarah Palin is a leader,
Sarah Palin is a wife,
Sarah Palin is a mother,
And she knows the way of life

She was born in small town Sandpoint
But Alaska was her call.
Barracuda was her nickname
When she championed basketball

refrain:
Ain’t got time to linger longer
Ain’t got time to stay behind
We must step up to the challenge
For she is one of a kind

Ain’t got time to watch destruction,
Nor to take our freedoms light.
Ain’t got time for politicking
We’re gettin’ ready to fight the fight.

Now this world should run much better
Thanks to more of CO2
Grows more food to feed the hungry
That’s what Climate Change will do.

But the Democrats in Congress
Think much more of One World Rule
Fight for Carbon Sequestration
They are stubborn as a mule.

Refrain.

Sarah Palin to the rescue
Sarah Palin to our aid
Sarah Palin to the forefront
‘gainst the cronies gettin’ paid.

On our knees we plead for mercy
On our knees we pray for grace
For the battle is the Lord’s, and
In His will we’ll run the race.

Refrain.

In this world of evil people
She will stand for what is right
While as Christians we are humbled
It is God who leads the fight.

With the Clintons and their Spirits
And Obama and Islam
And their hate for true religion
It is hard to keep the calm

Refrain:

Sarah Palin undefeated
Sarah Palin unafraid
Sarah Palin uncorrupted
By the Devil’s best plans laid.

It is time to stand for virtue
It is time to stand for truth
It is time to vote, be counted
So this land regains its youth.

Refrain.

“The Ideal Race.” Sarah Palin versus Hillary Clinton. A Limerick.

Are Hillary’s crimes a “distraction?”

Her arrogant style: No retraction.

Sarah Palin has time

as she is in her prime.

The race will be teeming with action.

From American Thinker on Sarah Palin “Achiever of the year 2014”:
It would be the height of churlishness for even the most inveterate leftist to deny the import of someone who made Time magazine’s “100 Most Influential People” list, and then the Smithsonian Institution’s “100 Most Significant Americans Of All Time” list. Both affirmations were earned by former Alaska governor and vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin.

To then accept Governor Palin as “American Achiever of the Year 2014″ would be for most, if not all on the left (and to be fair, many in the GOP) no doubt a bridge too far. However, such partisanship should not stand in the way of a general acknowledgement of what was a remarkable year for Palin.

[…]

Governor Palin endorsed 22 candidates for various offices during the midterm finals, including senators, governors, lieutenant governors, congressmen, and attorneys general. Of those so endorsed, an incredible 20 were elected – contrasted with, for example, Hillary Clinton’s record of 8 wins out 24 endorsed candidates

[…]

For all her detractors’ cries of “irrelevance” and “she’s just a reality show entertainer” (those two being among the nicer epithets), Palin goes on, election cycle after election cycle, populating Congress with her endorsed candidates in a cost-effective manner, and in such numbers that the likes of Karl Rove with his 1% success rate can surely view only with hidden admiration, if not downright envy.

[…]

In 2014, Governor Palin is deservedly the “Achiever of The Year.”