Verse 47 of the Obama Impeachment song. Secure the border! Not ours, you dummy, but Turkey’s.

President Obama finally understands that a sovereign country needs to have a secure border in order to protect its citizens.

The problem: He wants to secure Turkey’s border instead of ours.

U.S. President Barack Obama and Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan agreed in a telephone call on Wednesday to work together to “stem the flow of foreign fighters and secure Turkey’s border with Syria,” the White House said in a statement.

Which leads to verse 47 of the Obama Impeachment song (as if sung by Obama to the tune of “Please release me, let me go”)

Border must be made secure

I did the President assure

ISIS must be stopped for sure

not here, but that Turkey may endure.

And here is the whole impeachment song: https://lenbilen.com/2015/02/25/the-complete-obama-impeachment-song/

 

Verse 46 of the Obama Impeachment song. No crackdown on sanctuary cities until amnesty.

After a very emotional hearing in Congress from families who had loved ones murdered by illegal aliens it boggles my mind  how Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Sarah Saldaña can be so cold and callous about it by saying they won’t do anything until Congress passes comprehensive immigration reform, which is basically code for amnesty. Sanctuary cities.

A quote:  Sen. David Vitter: “This has been going on for years and you still are not prepared to say that there is ever going to be any negative consequence to those [sanctuary] jurisdictions. When is that going to change?”

Saldaña: “I presume when you all address comprehensive immigration reform; perhaps it can be addressed there.”

Which leads to Verse 46 of the Obama Impeachment song (as if sung by Obama to the tune of “Please release me, let me go”)

Sanctuary Cities – good.

It shields my comrades in the hood.

I have done all that I could

with help from the Muslim Brotherhood.

And here is the whole impeachment song: https://lenbilen.com/2015/02/25/the-complete-obama-impeachment-song/

The wall of separation between church and state. A Limerick.

GSTS70506 VI-7
GSTS70506 VI-7

“Separation of Church and the State”

is not “Of the Church from the State.”

Let our freedom hold sway

in the politics’ fray.

It is part of our Founders Estate.

President Obama and Hillary Clinton are leading the fight to change our constitutional right of “Freedom of Religion” to “Freedom of Worship” and even “Freedom From Religion.” But from the beginning it was not so.

It is no exaggeration to say that on Sundays in Washington during the administrations of Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809) and of James Madison (1809-1817) the state became the church. Within a year of his inauguration, Jefferson began attending church services in the House of Representatives. Madison followed Jefferson’s example, although unlike Jefferson, who rode on horseback to church in the Capitol, Madison came in a coach and four. Worship services in the House–a practice that continued until after the Civil War–were acceptable to Jefferson because they were nondiscriminatory and voluntary. Preachers of every Protestant denomination appeared. (Catholic priests began officiating in 1826.) As early as January 1806 a female evangelist, Dorothy Ripley, delivered a camp meeting-style exhortation in the House to Jefferson, Vice President Aaron Burr, and a “crowded audience.” Throughout his administration Jefferson permitted church services in executive branch buildings. The Gospel was also preached in the Supreme Court chambers.

Jefferson’s actions may seem surprising because his attitude toward the relation between religion and government is usually thought to have been embodied in his recommendation that there exist “a wall of separation between church and state.” In that statement, Jefferson was apparently declaring his opposition, as Madison had done in introducing the Bill of Rights, to a “national” religion. In attending church services on public property, Jefferson and Madison consciously and deliberately were offering symbolic support to religion as a prop for republican government.

Thomas Jefferson’s reply of January 1, 1802, to an address of congratulations from the Danbury (Connecticut) Baptist Association contains a phrase familiar in today’s political and judicial circles: “a wall of separation between church and state.” Many in the United States, including the courts, have used this phrase to interpret the Founders’ intentions regarding the relationship between government and religion, as set down by the First Amendment to the Constitution: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion . . . .” However, the meaning of this clause has been the subject of passionate dispute for the past fifty years.

Verse 45 of the Obama impeachment song. U.N. approves the Iran treaty without Congress approval.

Verse 45 of the Obama impeachment song (as if sung by Obama to the tune of “Please release me, let me go”)

U.N. must decide our fate.

Congress always acts to late.

On this deal I took the bait.

It’s World War III soon, I cannot wait.

The Confederate flag. Hate – or History? A Limerick.

confederate-flag

Confederate flagsI am the Confederate flag

Of me all the South used to brag.

Now the Democrats shame

of their old claim to fame.

Abolish my past – I’m a drag.

.

.

How soon we forget:

Clinton-Gore-Confederate-Flag1Confederate flag wavers meet Obama in Oklahoma:

ConfederateflagsgreetObama

Planned Parenthood Profits from peddling aborted body parts. A Limerick.

No pictures, no comments, it hurts too much.

Only this limerick.

Planned Parenthood acts are so bold

Aborted small bodies are gold

For research they are sold

it’s progressive we’re told.

Lord help us, when hearts are so cold!

O.K Just one comment. From Barack Obama on the same day the news of the Planned Parenthood merchandizing  baby organs broke.

“We recognize that every child deserves opportunity. Not just some. Not just our own.” —President Obama

A week has passed. Here is one ad from StemExpress

Product Description

Fetal Liver – CD133+ Stem/Progenitor Cells

Fetal Liver CD133+ Stem/Progenitor Cells (FL-CD133) are positively selected from homogenized liver tissue. First, fetal liver tissue is enzymatically digested and further processed to generate a leukocyte-rich suspension. CD133+ cells are then positively selected from the leukocyte-rich suspension using immunomagnetic anti-CD133 microbeads, leaving highly purified fetal liver CD133+ cells.

Place Custom Order

Format Catalog # QTY/Unit Price/Unit
Fresh FL0300F
FL0301F
FL0302F
0.5 million/vial
1 million/vial
2 million/vial
$3,031
$6,062
$12,124
Cryopreserved FL0300C
FL0301C
FL0302C
FL0303C
0.5 million/vial
1 million/vial
2 million/vial
5 million/vial
$2,425
$4,850
$9,700
$24,250
 There is profit in merchandizing aborted baby organs

Verse 42 of the Obama impeachment song. Pastor Saeed Abedini abandoned.

Verse 42 of the Obama impeachment song (as if sung by Obama to the tune of “Please release me, let me go”)

SaeedPastor Saeed left behind

He really wasn’t of my kind

It is not my axe to grind

My treasonous acts will blow your mind.

The fiscal status of all fifty states according to party rule.

The Mercatus Center of George Mason University has come out with a study of which states are most fiscally solvent as of fiscal year 2013. These are their rankings of all 50 states. The best fiscal status in enjoyed by states ruled by a Republican governor, Republican legislature. There are 25 of these with an average score of 0.87

1. Alaska                            8.26

2. North Dakota                2.97

3. South Dakota                2.84

4. Nebraska                       2.75

5. Florida                           2.74

6. Wyoming                       2.67

7. Ohio                               1.30

8. Tennessee                     1.10

9. Oklahoma                     0.99

11. Utah                            0.95

12. Nevada                       0.62

13. Alabama                     0.60

15. Idaho                           0.32

16. Indiana                        0.07

17. South Carolina          – 0.03

19. Texas                         – 0.12

24. Kansas                        – 0.48

26. Georgia                       – 0.58

27. North Carolina           – 0.63

28. Wisconsin                   – 0.64

29. Arkansas                     – 0.66

32. Arizona                        – 0.78

33. Mississippi                – 0.78

34. Michigan                    – 0.80

35. Louisiana                     – 0.85

Slightly negative for fiscal responsibility is to have a Democrat Governor, Republican Legislature. There are 6 of these with an average score of – 0.20

10. Montana                         0.98

14. Missouri                          0.49

20. New Hampshire          – 0.13

21 Virginia                          – 0.21

41. Pennsylvania               – 1.14

43. West Virginia              – 1.20

Now we are getting into real negative territory for fiscal solvency. We start with a Republican Governor, Split Legislature. There are six of those with an average score of  – 1.01

18. Iowa                              – 0.04

22. Colorado                     – 0.27

36. New Mexico               – 0.92

42.  Maine                          – 1.15

48. Massachusetts            – 1.84

50. Illinois                           – 1.86

Equally bad is to have a Democrat Governor, split Legislature. There are four of them with an average 0f  – 1.01

23. Washington                – 0.43

31. Minnesota                   – 0,70

45. Kentucky                    – 1.42

46. New York                   – 1.49

Worse still is to have a Democrat Governor, Democrat Legislature. The seven of them have an average score of – 1.09

25. Oregon                        – 0.50

30. Delaware                     – 0.69

38. Rhode Island               – 1.06

39. Vermont                       – 1.08

40. Hawaii                        – 1.08

44. California                      – 1.41

47. Connecticut                 – 1.83

And finally, worst of all is to have a Republican Governor, Democrat Legislature. There are two of those with an average

of – 1.42.

37. Maryland                      – 0.98

49. New Jersey                   – 1.86

This helps to explain why Democrats want the Federal Government to handle everything for them since their states are hopelessly irresponsible with their states affairs, while Republicans as a rule tend to want to have every state handle their own affairs as they see best fit.

One further startling observation is that New Jersey under Governor Chris Christie came in next to last. This helps to explain the reluctance of the more conservative (or fiscally responsible states) to endorse him for President.

On the other hand, Alaska came in first, not in small part due to the heroic efforts of Sarah Palin during her 31.7 month reign as Governor, where she managed to get the Credit Rating for her state to go from AA to AA+ and then raised again to AAA shortly after her resignation. She accomplished more in this short time than most governors do in two terms.

This also helps in part to explain the irrational hatred for Sarah Palin. She did clean up the graft and corruption in Alaska, and they are afraid she would do the same on a national level should she become President.

The ACLU no longer supports religious freedom. A Limerick.

News headline: ACLU: We’re Not Defending RFRA (Religious Freedom Restoration Act) Anymore

The ACLU just reported:

Religious freedom supported

is a thing of the past.

I say: This must not last!

Our freedoms must not be aborted!

source: http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2015/06/28/aclu-were-not-defending-religious-freedom-laws-anymore-n2018582?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=

The ten most attractive countries to invest in, and the ten worst.

Daniel Altman’s 2015 list of investment attractiveness by country is out. The ranking is based on an index for baseline profitability that assumes that three factors affect the ultimate success of a foreign investment: how much the value of an asset grows; the preservation of that value while the asset is owned; and the ease of repatriation of proceeds from selling the asset. The index combines measures for each of these factors into a summary statistic that conveys a country’s basic attractiveness for investment. Daniel Altman is the creator of the index and an Adjunct Professor at New York University’s Stern School of Business, in the Foreign Policy magazine.

How did it go? India jumped from number 6 to first, and Hong Kong, the 2014 leader slumped to the 11th position.

The list of the top ten is surprising, at least to a person unaccustomed to foreign investing.

1. India.

2. Qatar

3. Botswana.

4. Singapore.

5. Ghana.

6 Malaysia.

7. Mongolia.

8. Rwanda.

9. Zambia.

10. Sri Lanka.

How did the U.S.A. do? it came in as number 50 dropping 24 positions from 2014, when it came in as number 26.profitabilityindex

China dropped to number 65, down from number 60 in 2014.

And who are the ten worst countries to invest in? (The list only has 110 countries, so Iran, Cuba  and North Korea  among others are not included.)

101. Nigeria.

102. Belarus.

103. Italy.

104. Papua New Guinea.

105. Russia.

106. Lebanon.

107. Angola.

108. Dem. Rep. of Congo.

109. Argentina.

110. Venezuela.

The Hindu Digest added a nice picture to brag about the great progress India has made since Narendra Modi became Prime Minister.