Are Hillary’s crimes a distraction?
With Polls slipping she’s losing traction.
Sarah Palin has time
as she enters her prime.
The race will be teeming with action.
From American Thinker on Sarah Palin “Achiever of the year 2014”:
It would be the height of churlishness for even the most inveterate leftist to deny the import of someone who made Time magazine’s “100 Most Influential People” list, and then the Smithsonian Institution’s “100 Most Significant Americans Of All Time” list. Both affirmations were earned by former Alaska governor and vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin.
To then accept Governor Palin as “American Achiever of the Year 2014″ would be for most, if not all on the left (and to be fair, many in the GOP) no doubt a bridge too far. However, such partisanship should not stand in the way of a general acknowledgement of what was a remarkable year for Palin.
[…]
Governor Palin endorsed 22 candidates for various offices during the midterm finals, including senators, governors, lieutenant governors, congressmen, and attorneys general. Of those so endorsed, an incredible 20 were elected – contrasted with, for example, Hillary Clinton’s record of 8 wins out 24 endorsed candidates
[…]
For all her detractors’ cries of “irrelevance” and “she’s just a reality show entertainer” (those two being among the nicer epithets), Palin goes on, election cycle after election cycle, populating Congress with her endorsed candidates in a cost-effective manner, and in such numbers that the likes of Karl Rove with his 1% success rate can surely view only with hidden admiration, if not downright envy.
[…]
In 2014, Governor Palin is deservedly the “Achiever of The Year.”
Len Bilén's blog, a blog about faith, politics and the environment. 
The field is diverse I admit,
and a campaign can both miss and hit.
Ms. Palin talks fast,
but we know from the past,
if ever she’s questioned, she’ll QUIT!
From American Thinker on Sarah Palin Achiever of the year 2014:
It would be the height of churlishness for even the most inveterate leftist to deny the import of someone who made Time magazine’s “100 Most Influential People” list, and then theSmithsonian Institution’s “100 Most Significant Americans Of All Time” list. Both affirmations were earned by former Alaska governor and vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin.
To then accept Governor Palin as “American Achiever of the Year 2014″ would be for most, if not all on the left (and to be fair, many in the GOP) no doubt a bridge too far. However, such partisanship should not stand in the way of a general acknowledgement of what was a remarkable year for Palin.
[…]
Governor Palin endorsed 22 candidates for various offices during the midterm finals, including senators, governors, lieutenant governors, congressmen, and attorneys general. Of those so endorsed, an incredible 20 were elected – contrasted with, for example, Hillary Clinton’s record of 8 wins out 24 endorsed candidates
[…]
For all her detractors’ cries of “irrelevance” and “she’s just a reality show entertainer” (those two being among the nicer epithets), Palin goes on, election cycle after election cycle, populating Congress with her endorsed candidates in a cost-effective manner, and in such numbers that the likes of Karl Rove with his 1% success rate can surely view only with hidden admiration, if not downright envy.
[…]
In 2014, Governor Palin is deservedly the “Achiever of The Year.”
Since all I was commenting on was her behavior as a politician (she quits), and your reaction is to change the subject, I’ll consider my observation justified.
She quit as Oil and Gas Commissioner of Alaska to root out corruption within both the Republican and Democrats parties, ran for Governor and won.
She quit as Governor of Alaska to rebuild the Republican Party to a new majority, with candidates of her choice. That is not quitting, it is expanding her role.
Therefore the word quit does not fit.
I believe,Lenbilen, is right, she would make a good Vice president ,to gain more knowledge to run later on !!!