The records pile up: 1,082,549 new covid cases in a day, over 1 million adverse reactions to COVID vaccines, time to rethink herd immunity and approve Ivermectin and HCQ.

The headlines say it all. These are the results so far of adverse reactions to various medications and vaccines according to the official VAERS reporting, which give low estimates. The truth is worse. This is from Sen John Johnson:

It should be noted that for the first five medications the time frame is nearly 16 years, the result for COVID vaccine is one year.

Of all medications that actually works against COVID with a more than 75% efficiency, Ivermectin has been approved for human use against river blindness and other parasites, such as head lice since late 1980’s. The countries in Africa that routinely use it for parasite control have a COVID case and death rate of less than 1/10th of the countries in Africa that don’t. There are almost no adverse reactions.

HCQ is almost as good COVID fighter as Ivermectin when taken early in conjunction with Zinc. It’s effectiveness is at least 65% and has been used for over 50 years as an anti malaria drug, against lupus and some rheumatoid diseases. It is given to pregnant women and nursing mothers without restrictions.

Flue vaccines have very few adverse effects, but they happen.

Remdisivir was approved very fast, after all, it was expensive and showed early promising results, but it turned out that nearly 30% of the test clientele had used HCQ before entering the protocol. It turned out, that without HCQ it was not so good after all.

Alone in the history of vaccines has COVID vaccines been approved with such a staggering rate of adverse reactions and over 20,000 deaths from the vaccine in a year. Yet it helps people at risk, people over 60, obese, diabetic, anemic, vitamin C and D deficiency, immune compromised, high blood pressure and a variety of diseases, so they were important in the beginning of the disease, and will be for a while until the therapeutics are approved.

In the mean time , children and young adults without additional risk factors are at higher risk of dying if they take the vaccine than if they get COVID, older people should still go the vaccine route. With admittedly limited statistics available I have calculated the crossover point to be 45 years for people without additional risk factors.

With the arrival of the new Omicron variant, are vaccines contributing to the spread of COVID-19?

November 3, 2021, San Diego, County Board of Supervisors meeting. Dr Scot Youngblood MD.

7:32 video of a doctor decimating the vaccine narrative at the San Diego county board of supervisors meeting. Worth the watch and forward to all.

This talk was given before the arrival of the Covid-19 Omicron variant. An ominous warning is coming from the Isle of Man Chief Minister Alf Cannan: “The greatest concern is that the virus has mutated to such an extent that our immune systems, trained by the vaccine, no longer recognize the virus and no longer trigger an immune response. This sort of variant is called an immune escape variant. Early evidence suggests there may be a higher infection risk with Omicron.”

If that is true, who should then get the vaccine, and should we push the booster shot?

Here is another ominous chart from Israel, having a very high vaccination rate among Jews, mostly with the Pfizer vaccine. The younger Arab population has only half the vaccination rate, and logically they have twice the COVID case rate. Israel was the earliest to vaccinate, and in August was ready to do booster shots. The results: More vaccination deaths.

The results were so alarming that they nearly stopped the booster shots, awaiting further evaluation

Looking at death risk versus age, it seems logical that older people benefit from the vaccine. This chart is from 2020, without any vaccines available.

But no we know so much more. The VAERS data, while abundant is not readily available, but U.K. and Scotland publicize the results, and it is abundantly clear that what we have here is vaccines that are failing. While they reduce the symptoms for a fully vaccinated person the vaccine do not immunize but instead acts as a potential mutation agent for the infected person, and thus once in a while a new variant is born.

The problem is that the vaccines are too specific, and allow mutations to escape, much like specific antibiotics, while very effective in the beginning, once in a while a resistant mutation develops, rendering the antibiotic useless. We need to go back to the drawing board and develop more broadband vaccines. The mRNA method of combating diseases has a bright future, not as a vaccine, but to fight cancer. The field is wide open, and the technology is well advanced.

Meanwhile we should go back and fight COVID-19 the old fashioned way, with proven medications suggested here. In the meantime, if you are fully vaccinated and over 45, it is o.k. to take the booster vaccine. It will increase the individual protection, but the transmission risk remains.