Sarah Palin’s released e-mails vs. Wikileaks releases. A comparison.

A long time ago, after Obama had won the election there arose a rumor among the left leaning bloggers. It rose to a hysterical pace and media got involved. Sarah Palin had breast implants! Even Greta van Susteren asked her to her face whether that was so. So I penned this Limerick:

A Sarah Palin limerick on unfounded rumors.

Sarah Palin was facing the Great Inquisition

 by left-leaning bloggers, they reached no decision,

on things of great weight,

like shape, size and height.

As for perfect figure: There was no incision.

 

Nobody thought much of that (not even I) and it languished in blog-land. But then came the release of her 30000+ e-mails and the public was invited to crowd-source the document dump. The excitement was enormous. I remember Andrea Mitchell with bated breath asking one after another “Found anything yet” Every time the answer was no, not yet, only that she was a hard working governor with many cute Palinisms in otherwise terse, effective communications. One could see the disappointment in Andrea’s face. “Keep trying’ she breathed, but no avail. They found nothing.  Out of nowhere my little Limerick had 1800+ hits that day.

Contrast that with the total media apathy about the Wikileaks daily releases. There are one bombshell revelation after another, but Washington Post for example fails to notice.

Question: Why is presidential candidate Hillary Clinton now so much less a person of interest than was then private citizen Sarah Palin?

One more verse to the Hillary Nursery rhyme: Jail for Hillary?

“If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation because there has never been so many lies, so much deception,” Trump said to Clinton during Sunday’s presidential debate, referring to her use of a private email server as Secretary of State. “We’re going to have a special prosecutor.”

“It’s just awfully good that someone with the temperament of Donald Trump is not in charge of the law in our country,” Clinton said in response.

“Because you’d be in jail,” Trump retorted.

This adds one more verse to the Hillary Nursery rhyme:

Hillary, Hillary, where have you been?

“It’s none of your business, for I am the queen.”

……more……………

Hillary, Hillary, will you be in jail?

“I always escape. I will not fail.”

The whole nursery rhyme: https://lenbilen.com/2015/05/17/hillary-clinton-as-a-nursery-rhyme/

The scam that is the Clinton Foundation, a Limerick.

The Clinton Foundation, a scam,

a welfare for sycophants sham.

Five percent for the poor

they don’t dare ask for more.

The rest for campaigning flimflam.

The Clinton Foundation tax return for 2014 reveals that of an income of 178 million only 5,1 million went to charity, 38 million to salaries and 50 million to “other”, such as Bill Clinton’s extravagant globe trotting. 91 million was carried over into 2015. For what purpose? Considering the 2000 people on the payroll, many getting prepared to join her campaign.

As an interesting side the 8 executives with the highest pay were men, the next 3 were women, leaving the executive women making 63 percent as much as the men.

One of the prime goals of the Clinton Foundation was relief for Haiti. Precious little was accomplished. At least for the Haitians.

But all was not lost. Tony Rodham, brother of Hillary Clinton got the only goldmine concession in Haiti.

But the Haiti Sentinel wrote:

When the 2010 earthquake hit Haiti, former U.S. President Bill Clinton and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton exacerbated the devastation to their own benefit. In the end, billions of dollars donated by individuals from countries all around the world, weeks upon weeks of top story attention on any and every news agency around the world, left Haitians not just where they began, but in worse circumstances.

The tax filing:

clinton-fdn-taxes-610x486

 

 

Hillary Clinton’s medicines. What ails her?

NEW YORK — Talk radio star Michael Savage has characterized his being abruptly pulled off the radio on Monday afternoon following a discussion of Hillary Clinton’s health issues as an act of “pure sabotage.”

Mike Savage was pulled off the air

for mentioning drugs, that’s not fair.

Levodopa, one takes

against Parkinson’s shakes.

Is Hillary worse for the wear?

Here are some of the common side effects of Levodopa:

 

  • Abnormal thinking: holding false beliefs that cannot be changed by fact
  • agitation
  • anxiety
  • clenching or grinding of teeth
  • clumsiness or unsteadiness
  • confusion
  • difficulty swallowing
  • dizziness
  • excessive watering of mouth
  • false sense of well being
  • feeling faint
  • general feeling of discomfort or illness
  • hallucinations (seeing, hearing, or feeling things that are not there)
  • hand tremor, increased
  • nausea or vomiting
  • numbness
  • unusual and uncontrolled movements of the body, including the face, tongue, arms, hands, head, and upper body
  • unusual tiredness or weakness.

 

Does Hillary Clinton display any of these symptoms?

 

One more verse to the Hillary Nursery rhyme: Hillary Clinton cross eyed.

 

This adds one more verse to the Hillary Nursery rhyme:

Hillary, Hillary, where have you been?

“It’s none of your business, for I am the queen.”

……more……………

Hillary, Hillary, what’s with your eyes?

“Oh, nothing compared to my failures and lies.”

The whole nursery rhyme: https://lenbilen.com/2015/05/17/hillary-clinton-as-a-nursery-rhyme/

Hillary Clinton is ‘the butcher of Libya’. A Limerick with Pepe the Frog.

 

Hillary: Butcher of Libya

And Pepe the froglike amphibia.

Her disease hard to peg

so the frog pulls her leg.

Chris Matthews? A thrill up your tibia?

NEW YORK – Three members of the Libyan parliament representing tribes that were brutally attacked by Islamic militia both during and after the coup that ousted Moammar Gadhafi charge Hillary Clinton is the “Butcher of Libya.”

The three lawmakers spoke to WND from Libya in a video conference call.

“Libyans accuse that Hillary and her group are behind the terrorist groups in Libya,” said Jaballah Al-Shibani of the now-homeless Tawergha tribe.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/09/parliament-members-hillary-is-butcher-of-libya/#vJ7Ag0ZXybZzYRWE.99

President Obama took the campaign to the UN. A Limerick.

At UN, the strongest delusion

Obama displayed his confusion

Took a victory lap,

credibility gap.

His world view is but an illusion.

2 Thessalonians 2:10-13 (NKJV) and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie, that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

President Obama took the presidential campaign to the United Nation September 20.  Here are some excerpts:

From the depths of the greatest financial crisis of our time, we coordinated our response to avoid further catastrophe and return the global economy to growth. We’ve taken away terrorist safe havens, strengthened the nonproliferation regime, resolved the Iranian nuclear issue through diplomacy. We opened relations with Cuba, helped Colombia end Latin America’s longest warm, and we welcome a democratically elected leader of Myanmar to this Assembly. ……..

In remote corners of the world, citizens are demanding respect for the dignity of all people no matter their gender, or race, or religion, or disability, or sexual orientation, and those who deny others dignity are subject to public reproach. …….

And as these real problems have been neglected, alternative visions of the world have pressed forward both in the wealthiest countries and in the poorest: Religious fundamentalism; the politics of ethnicity, or tribe, or sect; aggressive nationalism; a crude populism — sometimes from the far left, but more often from the far right — which seeks to restore what they believe was a better, simpler age free of outside contamination.

We cannot dismiss these visions. They are powerful. They reflect dissatisfaction among too many of our citizens. I do not believe those visions can deliver security or prosperity over the long term, but I do believe that these visions fail to recognize, at a very basic level, our common humanity. Moreover, I believe that the acceleration of travel and technology and telecommunications — together with a global economy that depends on a global supply chain — makes it self-defeating ultimately for those who seek to reverse this progress. Today, a nation ringed by walls would only imprison itself.

So the answer cannot be a simple rejection of global integration. Instead, we must work together to make sure the benefits of such integration are broadly shared, and that the disruptions — economic, political, and cultural — that are caused by integration are squarely addressed. This is not the place for a detailed policy blueprint, but let me offer in broad strokes those areas where I believe we must do better together. …..

And that’s why we need to follow through on our efforts to combat climate change. If we don’t act boldly, the bill that could come due will be mass migrations, and cities submerged and nations displaced, and food supplies decimated, and conflicts born of despair. The Paris Agreement gives us a framework to act, but only if we scale up our ambition. And there must be a sense of urgency about bringing the agreement into force, and helping poorer countries leapfrog destructive forms of energy.

So, for the wealthiest countries, a Green Climate Fund should only be the beginning. We need to invest in research and provide market incentives to develop new technologies, and then make these technologies accessible and affordable for poorer countries. And only then can we continue lifting all people up from poverty without condemning our children to a planet beyond their capacity to repair.

So we need new models for the global marketplace, models that are inclusive and sustainable. And in the same way, we need models of governance that are inclusive and accountable to ordinary people. …….

This leads me to the third thing we need to do: We must reject any forms of fundamentalism, or racism, or a belief in ethnic superiority that makes our traditional identities irreconcilable with modernity. Instead we need to embrace the tolerance that results from respect of all human beings.

It’s a truism that global integration has led to a collision of cultures; trade, migration, the Internet, all these things can challenge and unsettle our most cherished identities. We see liberal societies express opposition when women choose to cover themselves. We see protests responding to Western newspaper cartoons that caricature the Prophet Muhammad…….

This is what I believe: that all of us can be co-workers with God. And our leadership, and our governments, and this United Nations should reflect this irreducible truth.

Thank you very much. (Applause.)