Thanks, OAN!
The votes that was counted in Wade
to Biden were switched, or mislaid.
What was meant for Don Trump
switched to Biden, or dumped.
New Age, like of Marquis de Sade.
Thanks, OAN!
The votes that was counted in Wade
to Biden were switched, or mislaid.
What was meant for Don Trump
switched to Biden, or dumped.
New Age, like of Marquis de Sade.
President Trump Made his “most important speech” on Dec 2, lasting 46 minutes and 7 seconds.
The media’s response to the speech was less than positive.
Factcheck.org Trump’s ‘Most Important’ speech was Mostly False
NYT: Trump delivers 46 minutes diatribe on the ‘Rigged’ election.
Independent.co.uk: Pres Trump in this 46 minute video he just released says this might be the most important speech he has ever given,”
cnn.com: 46 minutes that prove how dangerous Donald Trump is to democracy.
These were the first five suggestions on Google.
I have a great interest in making sure the elections are free from fraud, so in my view this must be fixed and secured. If the banks can do secure transactions, so can voting transactions be made secure. Without secure votes we will no longer have a country.
Arizona: @JennaEllisEsq “In Arizona we have over 500k ballots that were cast illegally. 11,000 are “over-votes”, meaning more votes cast than they have registered voters in a specific precinct. Just that alone would change the outcome of the election.
Georgia: The big news you need to hear about today is Ware County, Georgia. Dominion machines were seized. Equal number of Trump and Biden votes were forensically analyzed. However, the machines reported 87% for Trump and 113% for Biden. Should be 100% for both.
One snippet from Gateway-pundit: Data Expert Edward Solomon analyzed the 2020 election results in Georgia and identified another pattern in the data showing ultimately 200,000 votes transferred from President Trump to Joe Biden at the precinct level.
Nevada: In his ruling Friday, Judge James Russell said there was no evidence of fraud, writing what was shown to him did not prove any of the allegations.
In the state case that was dismissed, lawyers representing the Republican Party’s electors and the campaign said:
Michigan: ANTRIM COUNTY, MI – A man can examine election equipment by court order in the same northern Michigan county that saw early, but since corrected, issues with vote totals in the presidential election.
Judge Kevin Elsenheimer of the 13th Circuit Court in Antrim County ordered that William Bailey of Central Lake could take “forensic images” of the 22 tabulators used for a vote on a marijuana retailer proposal he is challenging.
The order makes no mention of Antrim County’s presidential results, where a software issue initially led to an inaccurate vote count that was corrected after a paper ballot recount, which awarded the county to President Donald Trump.
Instead, Bailey wants to overturn a proposal to allow a marijuana retailer in his village that initially resulted in a 262-262 tie, which was considered a loss for the proposal, the order stated. A retabulation saw the proposal pass by one vote, which Bailey alleges didn’t count three damaged ballots.
It is a “greater public interest” right now to confirm “the accuracy, integrity and security of the election process” than potential future misuse of election software discovered during the examination, Elsenheimer wrote.
The forensic examination took place Sunday with Bailey, Antrim County Clerk Sheryl Guy, county administrator Pete Garwood, county attorney Haider Kazim, three county commissioners, a county IT technician and a member of the Sheriff’s department, said county spokesman Jeremy Scott in a release.
Jenna Ellis, an attorney for Trump, told Fox News on Sunday that Elsenheimer “granted our team” access to the tabulating machines.
It is interesting the judge granted examination for the marijuana ballot initiative but not the presidential vote. Yet there has been a 6000 vore “error” in that county alone.
Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania Certified the 2020 vote, fraud and all. The numbers do not add up.

Wisconsin:

This absentee ballot surge should be recounted by hand to ensure there was no double loading of votes.
California: Voter fraud in California? Yes, millions of non-citizens with driver’s Licenses voted!
At least 29 states using Dominion voting machines: Benford’s law and the 2020 election. A Limerick on fraud.
Elections and fraud in this nation
cannot stand a close observation.
Zero Trump votes are added
but Joe Biden’s are padded
an act of the left’s desperation.
Living in Pennsylvania I take a keen interest in checking the voter result. Somebody took a screenshot of the vote counting in Lancaster Co.

This was partial results. How did it stack up for the whole state? The results are in and certified by none other than Governor Wolf, so these must be true results:

So what were the results? These are the official numbers from Sidney Powell

If all of these counted ballots count we get the following result:
Joseph R. Biden 3,456,008, Donald J. Trump: 3,465,578.
But the official tally was as Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar made the final count official three weeks after the Nov. 3 election: Biden received 3,458,229 votes, 80,555 more than President Donald Trump’s 3,377,674 votes. Biden won 50.01% of the vote to 48.8% for Trump.
However it is impossible to have more legal mail-in ballots than was officially requested. The mail-in votes for Trump was 22.97% of the total, so we should at least take away 258,813 votes away from President Trump and the remaining overcount of 868,127 votes away from Joe Biden.
This would give a net vote count for President Trump of 3,118,861 votes and a net count for Joseph R Biden of 2,590,102 votes
In other words: President Donald J. Trump won Pennsylvania by 528,759 votes!
Please recount all mail-in ballots and explain what happened!
And while you are at it, recount by hand
7th Congressional DistrictVotes: D Susan Wild 195,713 51.9%
R Lisa Scheller 181,569 48.1%
8th Congressional District
Votes: D Matt Cartwright 178,407 51.8%
R Jim Bognet 166,201 48.2%
17th Congressional District1
Votes: D Conor Lamb 222,242 51.1%
R Sean Parnell 212,279 48.9%
They could all flip when the mail-in overcount is removed!
County 2020 Biden Trump %B %T
2016 Clinton Trump %C %T
2012 Obama Romney %O %R
Philadelphia 2020 594,005 131,330 81.4% 18%
2016 584,025 108,748 82.3% 15.3%
2012 557,024 91,840 85.2% 14.1%
Allegheny 2020 428,876 282,170 59.6% 39.2%
(Pittsburgh) 2016 357,167 259,480 55.9% 39.5%
2012 348,151 259,304 56.6% 42.2%
Maricopa co 2020 1.040,774 995,665 50.3% 48.1%
(Phoenix, AZ) 2016 702,907 747,361 44.8% 47,7%
2012 532,284 680.089 43.2% 55.1%
Wayne Co 2020 587,074 264,149 68.1% 30.7%
(Detroit) 2016 519,444 228,993 66.4% 29.3%
2012 595,253 213,586 73.1% 26.2%
Kent CO 2020 186,753 165.318 52% 46%
(Grand Rapids) 2016 138,683 148,180 44.6% 47.7%
2012 134,560 157,801 45.5% 53.4%
Milwaukee co 2020 317,270 134,357 69.4% 29.4%
Wisconsin 2016 288,822 128,069 65.5% 28.6%
2012 328,090 158,430 66.8% 32.3%
Dane Co 2020 260,185 78,800 75.7% 22.9%
(Madison) 2016 217,697 71,275 70.4% 23.0%
2012 215,389 83,459 71.1% 27.6%
Clark Co 2020 521,852 430,930 53.7% 44.3%
(Las Vegas) 2016 402,227 320,057 52.4% 41.7%
2012 387,978 288,223 56.4% 41.9%
Fulton Co 2020 381,144 137,240 72,6% 26.2%
(Atlanta) 2016 297,051 117,783 67.7% 26.8%
2012 248,479 133,837 64.2% 34.6%
DeKalb Co 2020 308,140 58,369 83.1% 15.7%
2016 251,370 51,469 79.1% 16.2%
2012 237,704 64.308 77.9% 21.1%
Gwinnett Co 2020 241,827 166,413 58.4% 40.2%
2016 166,153 146,989 50.2% 44.4%
2012 131,879 159,563 44.6% 54%
State · Clinton (D) Trump (R) D % R % D’12 D’16 Margin Total ’12 Total ’16
Votes Votes 2016 2016 Margin Shift Votes Votes
2020 Biden (D) Trump (R) total 2020
Raw Votes vs. ’12 U.S.
Total 65,844,610 62,979,636 48.2% 46.1% 3.9% 2.1% -1.8% 129,075,630 136,628,459
2020 79,982,189 73,288,903 153,271,062
Swing States
Arizona* 1,161,167 1,252,401 45.1% 48.7% -9.1% -3.5% 5.5% 2,299,254 2,573,165
2020 1,672,054 1,661,677 49.4% 49.1%
Colorado* 1,338,870 1,202,484 48.2% 43.3% 5.4% 4.9% -0.5% 2,569,521 2,780,220
2020 1,803,921 1,364,202 55,4% 41.9%
Florida* 4,504,975 4,617,886. 47.8% 49.0% 0.9% -1.2% -2.1% 8,474,179 9,420,039
2020 5,297,029 5,668,728 47.9% 51.2%
Iowa* 653,669 800,983 41.7% 51.1% 5.8% -9.4% -15.2% 1,582,180 1,566,031
2020 758,597 897,356 45% 53,2%
Maine* 357,735. 335,593. 47.8% 44.9% 7.3% 15.3% 3.0% -12.3% 713,180 747,927
2020 430,023 359,502 52.9% 44.2%
Michigan* 2,268,839 2,279,543 47.3% 47.5% 9.5% -0.2% -9.7% 4,730,961 4,799,284
2020 2,795,184 2,649,063 50.6% 47,9%
Minnesota* 1,367,716 1,322,951 46.4% 44.9% 7.7% 1.5% -6.2% 2,936,561 2,944,813
Nevada* 539,260. 512,058. 47.9% 45.5% 6.7% 2.4% -4.3% 1,014,918 1,125,385
2020 703,486 669,890 50.1% 47.7%
N. Hampshire 348,526 345,790 46.8% 46.5% 5.6% 0.4% -5.2% 710,972 744,158
2020 423,291 365,373 52.8% 45.6%
N. Carolina* 2,189,316. 2,362,631. 46.2% 49.8% -2.0% -3.7% -1.6% 4,505,372 4,741,564
2020 2,683,787 2,757,112 48.7% 50%
Ohio* 2,394,164 2,841,005 43.6% 51.7% 3.0% -8.1% -11.1% 5,580,840 5,496,487
2020 2,603,731 3,074,418 46.5% 52.1%
Pennsylvania2,926,441 2,970,733 47.9% 48.6% 5.4% -0.7% -6.1% 5,753,546 6,115,402
2020 3,434,458 3,361,131 50.0% 48,9%
Wisconsin* 1,382,536 1,405,284 46.5% 47.2% 6.9% -0.8% -7.7% 3,068,434 2,976,150
2020 1,630,683 1,610,139 49.6% 48.9%
Non-Swing States
Alabama* 729,547 1,318,255 34.4% 62.1% -22.2% -27.7% -5.5% 2,074,338 2,123,372
2020 843,724 1,434,315 36.6% 62.3%
Alaska* 116,454 163,387 36.6% 51.3% -14.0% -14.7% -0.7% 300,495 318,608
2020 (98%) 150,155 185,807 43% 53.2%
Arkansas* 380,494. 684,872. 33.7% 60.6% -23.7% -26.9 -3.2% 1,069,468 1,130,635
2020 418,811 757,315 34,6% 62.6%
California* 8,753,788 4,483,810 61.7% 31.6% 23.1% 30.1% 7.0% 13,038,547 14,181,595
2020 (96%) 10,759,316 5,749,736 63.8% 34.1%
Connecticut* 897,572 673,215 ,54.6% 40.9% 17.3% 13.6% -3.7% 1,558,114 1,644,920
2020 1,080,471 714,581 59.3% 39.2%
Delaware* 235,603 185,127 53.4% 41.9% 18.6% 11.4% -7.2% 413,890 441,590
2020 295,493 199,829 58.8% 39.8%
D. C.* 282,830 12,723 90.9% 4.1% 83.6% 86.8% 3.1% 293,764 311,268
2020 307,265 18,172 92.9% 5.5%
Georgia* 1,877,963 2,089,104 45.9% 51.0% -7.8% -5.2% 2.7% 3,900,050 4,092,373
2020 2,472,002 2,457,880 49.5% 49.2%
Hawaii* 266,891 128,847 62.2% 30.0% 42.7% 32.2% -10.5% 434,697 428,937
2020 (96%) 365,802 196,602 63.7% 34.3%
Idaho* 189,765 409,055 27.5% 59.3% -31.9% -31.8% 0.1% 652,274 690,255
2020 286,991 554,019 33.1% 63.9%
Illinois* 3,090,729 2,146,015 55.8% 38.8% 16.9% 17.1% 0.2% 5,242,014 5,536,424
2020 3.414.236 2,405,750 57.6% 40.6%
Indiana* 1,033,126. 1,557,286.37.8% 56.9% -10.2%-19.2% -9.0% 2,624,534 2,734,958
2020 1,242,163 1,729,472 41% 57.1%
Kansas* 427,005 671,018 36.1% 56.7% -21.7% -20.6% 1.1% 1,159,971 1,184,402
2020 551,144 752,903 41.3% 56.5%
Kentucky* 628,854 1,202,971 32.7% 62.5% -22.7% -29.8% -7.1% 1,797,212 1,924,149
2020 772,285 1,326,418 36.2% 62.1%
Louisiana* 780,154 1,178,638 38.4% 58.1% -17.2% -19.6% -2.4% 1,994,065 2,029,032
2020 856,034 1,255,776 39.9% 58.5%
Maryland* 1,677,928. 943,169 60.3% 33.9% 26.1% 26.4% 0.3% 2,707,327 2,781,446
2020 1,905,407 958,547 65.3% 32.9%
Mass.* 1,995,196 1,090,893 60.0% 32.8% 23.1% 27.2% 4.1% 3,167,767 3,325,046
2020 2,316,338 1,148,777 65.6% 32.6%
Mississippi* 485,131 700,714 40.1% 57.9% -11.5% -17.8% -6.3% 1,285,584 1,209,357
2020 514,891 741,571 40.4% 58.2%
Missouri* 1,071,068 1,594,511 38.1% 56.8% -9.4% -18.6% -9.3% 2,757,323 2,808,605
2020 1,242,851 1,711,848 41.3% 56.9%
Montana* 177,709 279,240 35.7% 56.2% -13.7% -20.4% -6.8% 484,048 497,147
2020 244,833 343,643 40.5% 56.9%
Nebraska* 284,494 495,961 33.7% 58.7% -21.8% -25.0% -3.3% 794,379 844,227
2020 371,921 553,793 39.3% 58.6%
N. Jersey* 2,148,278 1,601,933 55.5% 41.4% 17.8% 14.1% -3.7% 3,640,292 3,874,046
2020 (94%) 2,419,324 1,759,713 57.2% 41.6%
New Mexico* 385,234. 319,666. 48.3% 40.0% 10.1% 8.2% -1.9% 783,758 798,318
2020 499,782 401,361 54.3% 43.5% 901143
New York* 4,547,218 2,814,346 59.0% 36.5% 28.2% 22.5% -5.7% 7,072,083 7,710,126
2020 (81%) 3,804,597 2,890,532 56.1% 42.6%
North Dakota* 93,758 216,794 27.2% 63.0% -19.6% -35.7% -16.1% 322,932 344,360
2020 114,902 235,595 31.9% 65.5%
Oklahoma* 420,375 949,136 28.9% 65.3% -33.5% -36.4% -2.8% 1,334,872 1,452,992
2020 503,289 1,018,870 32.3% 65.4%
Oregon* 1,002,106. 782,403. 50.1% 39.1% 12.1% 11.0% -1.1% 1,789,270 2,001,336
2020 1,329,567 949,646 56.9% 40.6%
Rhode Island* 252,525 180,543 54.4% 38.9% 27.5% 15.5% -11.9% 446,049 464,144
2020 306,192 199,830 59.6% 38.9%
S. Carolina* 855,373 1,155,389 40.7% 54.9% -10.5% -14.3% -3.8% 1,964,118 2,103,027
2020 1,091,348 1,384,852 43,4% 55.1%
South Dakota* 117,458 227,721 31.7% 61.5% -18.0% -29.8% -11.8% 363,815 370,093
2020 (94%) 150,467 261,035 35.6% 61.8%
Tennessee* 870,695 1,522,925 34.7% 60.7% -20.4% -26.0% -5.6% 2,458,577 2,508,027
2020 1,139,666 1,849,211 37.4% 60.7%
Texas* 3,877,868 4,685,047 43.2% 52.2% -15.8% -9.0% 6.8% 7,993,851 8,969,226
2020 5,236,610 5,874,547 46.5% 52.1%
Utah* 310,676 515,231 27.5% 45.5% 27.0% -48.0% -18.1% 30% 1,017,40 1,131,430
2020 555,694 852.677 37.8% 58%
Vermont* 178,573 95,369 56.7% 30.3% 13.1% 35.6% 26.4% -9.2% 299,290 315,067
2020 242,805 112,688 66.4% 30.8%
Virginia* 1,981,473 1,769,443 49.8% 44.4% 5.8% 3.9% 5.3% 1.5% 3,854,489 3,982,752
2020 2,404,510 1,961,126 54.3% 44.3%
Washington* 1,742,718 1,221,747 51.8% 36.3% 14.9% 15.5% 0.6% 3,125,516 3,365,644
2020 3,359,319 1,574,498 58.4% 39%
West Virginia* 188,794 489,371 26.5% 68.6% -26.8% -42.2% -15.4% 670,438 713,051
2020 235,657 544,826 29.7% 68.6%
Wyoming* 55,973 174,419 21.9% 68.2% -40.8% -46.3% -5.5% 249,061 255,849
2020 73,491 193,559 26.7% 70.4%
After the 2016 election Judicial Watch made an investigation of the California election. The Federal Government maintains a list of its citizens, the state governments don’t. Judicial watch made an investigation of the registered voters and found that eleven counties had more voters registered than the number of eligible voters. Here is a list of them:
County Vote Vote % eligible Clinton/
—————— Clinton Trump registered Trump
Los Angeles 1,893,770 620,285 144 3.05
San Diego 567,243 386,807 138 1.47
San Francisco 312,445 34,493 114 9.06
San Mateo 192,035 47,627 111 4.03
Solano 94,622 48,712 111 1.94
Yolo 34,460 13,178 110 2.61
Santa Cruz 85,185 20,158 109 4.23
Monterey 64,733 26,378 104 2.45
Stanislaus 73,939 72,960 102 1.01
Imperial 23,887 9,318 102 2.56
Lassen 2,224 7,574 102 0.29
11 Co. Total 3,344,543 1,287,490 2.60
Rest of Calif 2,514,062 1,391,229 1.81
All Calif. 5,858,605 2,678,719 2.19
This compilation is remarkable in so many ways.
California has 3.4 million resident aliens (green card holders and special visas). They are not eligible to vote. They also have about 3 million illegal aliens (obviously not eligible to vote)
California has motor voter registration. They issue driver’s licenses to, not only resident aliens but also to illegal aliens. All they have to do to be registered to vote is to check a box indicating they are eligible. No check for its validity is performed.
Los Angeles County is the capital of illegal aliens, so it comes as no surprise that since they now have driver’s licenses and thereby by extension are made eligible to vote, the ratio of 1.44 between registered voters and lawfully eligible voters comes as no surprise.
Silicon valley has more resident aliens than other areas of California, so it is no surprise they have registered voters exceeding eligible voters.
There is one small county located way up in North East California, Lassen County which voted heavily for Trump. It has only two major employers, two state prisons and one federal prison. Could Lassen County have registered ineligible felons?
This calls for a thorough investigation if the integrity of voting means anything.
The link to the letter from Judicial watch to CA, http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/nvra-letter-ca-august-2017/
As far as I know nothing was done to remedy the situation.
California is no longer a growing state. The population may even be declining in 2020. See this chart:

So we would then expect the numbers for the 2020 election to be about the same
County 2020 Vote 020 Vote Increase Increase
—————— Biden Trump Biden Trump
Los Angeles 2,609,329 984,383 37.8% 58.7%
San Diego 933,468 577,573 64.6% 49.3%
San Francisco 373,186 55,347 19.4% 60.5%
San Mateo 225,185 54,456 17.2% 14.3%
Solano 124,752 65,558 31,8% 34.6%
Yolo 47,504 16,128 36,7% 22,4%
Santa Cruz 109,745 25,485 28.8% 26.4%
Stanislaus 84,668 79,622 16.1% 8.1%
Imperial 34,430 20,577 44.1% 120.8%
Lassen 2,772 8,798 24.6% 16.2%
One more county is of interest, Orange Co. It used to be solidly Republican
2020 792,966 655,811 Total: 1,448,777 Advantage Biden 20.9%
2016 556,544 472,669 Total: 1,029,213 Advantage Clinton 17.8%
2012 457,077 541,092 Total: 998,169 Advantage Romney 18.4%
2008 518,925 557,370 Total: 1,076,295 Advantage McCain 7.4%
Elections and fraud in this nation
cannot stand a close observation.
Zero Trump votes are added
but Joe Biden’s are padded
an act of the left’s desperation

This is a map of the extent to which Dominion voting machines software is presently used. When votes are tallied it produces results that are not credible according to statistical science.
Joe Biden’s votes violate Benford’s Law, President Trump’s do not.
Benford’s law or the first-digit law, is used to check if a set of numbers are naturally occurring or manually fabricated. It has been applied to detect the voting frauds in Iranian 2009 election and various other applications including forensic investigations.
Benford’s Law, also called the Newcomb–Benford law, the law of anomalous numbers, or the first-digit law, is an observation about the frequency distribution of leading digits in many real-life sets of numerical data. The law states that in many naturally occurring collections of numbers, the leading digit is likely to be small. For example, in sets that obey the law, the number 1 appears as the leading significant digit about 30% of the time, while 9 appears as the leading significant digit less than 5% of the time. If the digits were distributed uniformly, they would each occur about 11.1% of the time. Benford’s law also makes predictions about the distribution of second digits, third digits, digit combinations, and so on.
Plots of the first digits of counts in various precincts and wards for selected counties/cities.

This is Pittsburgh.

But even cities where we know the outcome, the numbers have been manipulated such as

When this fraud is corrected the electoral map will look quite different, and may even swing a few house and senate votes.
The Corona-virus pandemic has now been with us nine months and for the first time the trends ate looking better, giving us hope that the worst is over.
In the beginning the worldwide death rate was 8,65% and it is now down to 1.31%, a reduction of 84.8%. Total deaths worldwide are about 1,200,000 which is still less then the annual TB deaths that amount to 1.6 million, of which 300,000 are HIV positive.
The corresponding numbers for U.S.A : 7.02% death rate at the beginning of the disease. It is now down to 1.04%, an 85.2% decrease. With unrestricted availability to take HCQ+ we can reduce the death rate even further.
Now it is getting interesting. While nearly all industrialized nations shut down their non-essential functions, such as schools, elective surgery, elective medical diagnostics, non food stores, flights, travel, restaurants, non essential government services and the like Sweden took a different approach. They kept their elementary schools open, did not close stores and restaurants, only large gatherings, mandated increased hygiene and to practice social distancing, and then they let the virus rage as a normal flu, and waited for the so called “herd immunity.” Wearing masks were never mandated, only encouraged when social distancing was impossible to maintain. Sweden did their best though to protect the vulnerable.
In the beginning the results were disastrous. The initial death rate was over 21%, it seemed like a failed attempt, but then things started to calm down. In late spring the death rate had settled down to 9.2%, but then came a second wave of cases and everyone was bracing for the worst. But the death rate did not rise, and is now down to 0.24%. (Oct 30)

The rest of Europe (except Belarus) did try to limit the spread of the coronavirus using heavy lockdowns. This limited the spread of the virus for a while, and through the summer it looked like it was the right thing to do, but “herd immunity was never achieved. Now, when the flu season has arrived the cases are rising again, and for the western Europe nations cases are now rising, and so are deaths. In Germany the death rate has increased 14-fold since the summer minimum, in Spain the death rate is increased 80-fold, in France the death rate is increased 30-fold. The United Kingdom death rate is increased 35-fold and the kingdom is ready to issue another draconian lockdown, other countries are also issuing curfews and other restrictions.
The virus will run its course until herd immunity is achieved. Vaccines will finally limit the pandemic. Thanks to President Trump’s “warp speed” initiative, paying private enterprise to produce the vaccine at the same time level 3 testing is underway so the vaccine is available as soon as it is approved, vaccines will be available weeks from now rather than years from now.
This is expensive, but if any of the 6 vaccines succeed, it was worth it, if all fails we are no worse off than if we wreck the economy with another lockdown that only delays the inevitable, herd immunity achieved years from now with more deaths than if we had followed the example of Sweden.
The take-home from Tuesday’s debate
is not that it was full of hate
but the fear Joe displayed
he was more than dismayed
that Spygate would seal his own fate.
In 1956, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved HCQ for symptoms of lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, particularly skin inflammation, hair loss, mouth sores, fatigue, and joint pain. It was deemed safe to take in perpetuity with a weight appropriate daily dose, typically 250 to 500 mg/day. In fact it is deemed so safe that pregnant women and nursing mothers can take it without restrictions.
The number of corona-virus cases for U.S.A as of September 5 is 6,452,833 and deaths are 193,121 making the death rate 3.00%. There are four states: New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Michigan, under DOJ investigation because they required nursing homes to admit and readmit COVID-19 cases resulting in many deaths. If these states are excluded from the count the death rate would be 2.30%
The Democratic convention speakers assured us that this was the worst result of any country in the world, thanks to President Trump’s inaction and refusal to accept science. So, how does U.S.A. compare to the rest of the world? The cases, deaths and death rates for all countries with higher death rates are listed below:
(All numbers are received from https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/)
1. Yemen 1,987 572 28.8%
2. Italy 277,634 35,541 12.8%
3. United Kingdom 347,152 41,551 12.0%
4. Belgium 87,825 9,906 11.3%
5. Mexico 629,409 67,326 10.7%
6. France 324,777 30,724 9.5%
7. Netherlands 74,787 6,243 8.4%
8. Channel Islands 631 48 7.6%
9. Hungary 8,387 624 7.4%
9. Chad 1,034 77 7.4%
10. Isle of Man 337 24 7.1%
11. Canada 131,858 9,145 6.9%
11. Sweden 84,985 5,835 6,9%
13 Liberia 1,307 82 6.3%
14. Sudan 13,407 832 6.2%
15. Ireland 29,672 1,777 6.0%
16. San Marino 716 42 5.9%
16. Niger 1,177 69 5.9%
18. Iran 386,658 22,293 5.8%
19. Ecuador 118,045 6,724 5.7%
19. Spain 517,133 29,418 5.7%
21. Egypt 98,062 5,342 5.4%
22. Switzerland 44,401 2,013 4.5%
22. Mali 2,842 127 4.5%
22. Bolivia 120,241 5,398 4.5%
25. Andorra 1,215 53 4.4%
26. Slovenia 3,165 135 4.3%
26. Peru 683,702 29,687 4.3%
28. Indonesia 194,109 8,025 4.1%
28. Finland 8,291 336 4.1%
28. North Macedonia 15,090 617 4.1%
28. Tanzania 509 21 4.1%
32. Barbados 178 7 3.9%
32. Burkina Faso 1,408 55 3.9%
32. Bulgaria 17,050 671 3.9%
35. Germany 251,456 9,401 3.7%
35. Sint Maarten 511 19 3.7%
35. Guatemala 77,481 2,845 3.7%
35. Afghanistan 38,398 1,412 3,7%
39. Denmark 17,883 627 3.5%
40. Brazil 4,123,000 126,266 3.1%
41. Poland 70,824 2,120 3.0%
That’s right! U.S.A. ranks as 42th worst country!
Now there are countries that do better, some much better. One group has this in common: They administer a proper therapy of hydroxychloroquine, most often with Zinc and Z-max as soon as symptoms occur, with or without a positive test. Some of the countries are so poor that it is all they can afford. The result?
Country Cases Deaths
1. Qatar 120,905 203 0.17% The country of Qatar consists of 88% temporary workers between the ages of 20 and 60 and most of the deaths occurred in the remaining 12% of the original population. This means that the death rate of persons between the ages of 20 and 60 is less than 0.2% if given HCQ + Zinc as soon as symptoms occur or as a prophylactic administered instead of contact tracing and quarantine. If this regimen would be implemented immediately we could fully open schools and universities, have college and professional sports again and fully open all businesses. The most vulnerable would of course still have to be protected.
2. Bahrain 54,771 199 0.3% Again, about half of the population are immigrants or guest workers. They have a high rate of obesity and diabetes, but HCQ seems to be working excellent in Bahrain
3. UAE 73,984 388 0.5% The United Arab Emirates is a nation of 88% non-citizen immigrants and guest workers. there are over twice as many males as there are females.
4. Israel 130,157 1,012 0.8%
5. Costa Rica 46,920 478 1.0%
6. Malaysia 9,397 128 1.4%
7. South Korea 21,177 334 1.6%
8. India 4,202,562 71,687 1.71%
9. Russia 1,025,505 17,820 1.74%
10. Morocco 72,394 1,361 1.9%
11. Ukraine 135,894 2,846 2.1%
12. Senegal 13,987 290 2.1%
13. Cuba 4,309 101 2.3%
14. Turkey 279,806 6,673 2.4%
15. Greece 11,524 284 2.5%
There are countries that are not doing as well as U.S.A. in combating the corona pandemic, even though they freely administer HCQ. They are
16. Algeria 46,364 1,556 3.4%
17. Indonesia 194,109 8,025 4.1%
and probably others. Many countries’ health statistics are of dubious accuracy. That is why China is excluded.
Other countries, such as
Iceland 2,141 10 0.5%
Faeroe Islands 413 0 0.0%
Japan 70,876 1,349 1.9% have had success with a thorough contact tracing and quarantine. This can only be done if caught at the earliest stages of the disease. Remember, Japan never allowed the people from the infected cruise ship to enter Japanese soil and be treated in hospitals.
Vaccine may not be as effective as first thought. The china corona virus has mutated into 11 strains, and continues to mutate, so a universal vaccine cannot be developed, but like the flu, every year will have a new regional strain to combat.
The solution is to implement a hydroxychloroquine + Zinc + Zitromax regimen, both as a prophylactic and as a therapy as soon as symptoms occur.
According to the Ford study treatment with hydroxychloroquine cut the death rate significantly in sick patients hospitalized with COVID-19 – and without heart-related side-effects, the new study published by Henry Ford Health System. The death rate was cut in half for patients treated with HCQ. It is even more dramatic if HCQ is administered as soon as symptoms occur, over 40 international studies have shown an up to 80+% reduction in death rates. For some reason FDA and CDC do not acknowledge international studies. They rather let people die than accept a drug that has been approved for 64 years, and given freely to people with Lupus. It is so safe it is even given to pregnant women and nursing mothers.
How many extra deaths are we talking about? HCQ is already administered under right to try by about 16% of all cases. If it had been recommended in April, one month after President Trump recommended it based on excellent results in french studies, about half the deaths from then on could have been avoided. It adds up, about 1.5% of all cases since April 15, or about 78,000 deaths could have been avoided, and moving forward about 600 deaths a day. This is in my opinion a low estimate.
Another significant moment in the hydroxychloroquine debate came on July 23 in the form of an opinion piece. Harvey A. Risch, MD, PhD, a professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health with many years of healthcare experience, wrote in favor of the medication, calling it “highly effective” and describing physicians who use it “in the face of widespread skepticism” as heroes.
In his opinion piece, Risch listed several studies that have pointed to the benefits of treating COVID-19 with hydroxychloroquine. He also wrote about how the medication has been politicized and said it “has not been used properly in many studies.”
“In the future, I believe this misbegotten episode regarding hydroxychloroquine will be studied by sociologists of medicine as a classic example of how extra-scientific factors overrode clear-cut medical evidence,” he concluded. “But for now, reality demands a clear, scientific eye on the evidence and where it points. For the sake of high-risk patients, for the sake of our parents and grandparents, for the sake of the unemployed, for our economy and for our polity, especially those disproportionally affected, we must start treating immediately.”
His assessment of lives saved with HCQ ++ was 70,000 lives would have been saved as of Aug 1 if HCQ had been used as early as possible. He is the scientist, I am using public data drawn from a population of 2 billion people, and we reached a very similar conclusion.
Do it! The fact that President Trump has advocated it as early as March should not be a hindrance to save 600 lives a day!