Old Testament proof of the resurrection of the Messiah.

For a long time the oldest manuscripts of the Old Testament was the Masoretic text from the 7th to the 10th century AD.Then in 1947 and 1948 a an Arab bedo:uin discovered the Qumran caves that were full of old scrolls. The most famous was a near complete scroll if the Prophet Isaiah, dated to about 150 before Christ. While there were numerous minor textual differences between the copies, none of them mattered much. Or so I was told. The Tübingen School (Tübinger Schule) was a highly influential 19th-century German theological movement at the University of Tübingen that pioneered the historical-critical method of biblical research. They proved that Isaiah 53 was a later addition to the book of Isiah. one of their argument came from the 17th-century Jewish historian, Raphael Levi. He admitted that long ago the rabbis used to read Isaiah 53 in synagogues, but after the chapter caused “arguments and great confusion” the rabbis decided that the simplest thing would be to just take that prophecy out of the Haftarah readings in synagogues. That’s why today when they read Isaiah 52, they stop in the middle of the chapter, and the week after, they jump straight to Isaiah 54.

But it is even more remarkable than that. There is one word missing from the Masoretic text that is found both is the Dead Sea scroll and the Greek Septuagint translation. Here is the difference in Isaiah 53:11

The first translation is the King James translation. It follows the Masoretic text and says see and be satisfied.

The second translation incorporates the Dead Sea scroll (also in the Septuagint) missing word: see the light of life and be satisfied. The light of life is one word in Hebrew and means come to life or resurrection.

When the early Christians had an opportunity to read the Bible, most of them could not read Hebrew at all, but some could read Greek and read the Septuagint Isaiah 53 with light of life included. Could it be that the light of life was taken out of the Masoretic text because the Jews wanted badly to have Isaiah 53 refer to the rebirth of the state of Israel after many years of suffering?

The second question is: When did it or will this happen? The answer is found in Daniel 9:26

The answer is: Before the destruction of both Jerusalem and the Temple in AD 70. This means the Messiah was resurrected somewhere before AD 70.

The third question is: To whom did the Messiah give His message? As is shown here in Jeremiah 31:31-34 it was initially given to the people of Israel

The Israel people lived under the Mosaic and Davidic covenants, which involved animal and other sacrifices to obtain forgiveness for a time. Once a year during the day of Atonement the High Priest the High Priest went in to the Holy of Holiest to clear the people from their unwittingly committed sins during the previous year. The next year it had to be performed again. The wilful sins had to be atoned for separately. To be a good Jew you must not only eat kosher food, but prepare it ahead before sabbath. A different process was to be followed if there was a double sabbath, the maximum length of a sabbath day’s journey, how to give tithing of cumin and other small spices so as not to give too much or too little, the proper way to fast and so on. This was later documented in the Talmud.

The prophet Jeremiah lived just before the people of Judah was taken into 70 years of captivity in Babylon, so when this prophesy was given it was taken to mean that the Messiah would come and restore the grandeur of Israel and save it from all oppressors. So at the time of Jesus the 69 “weeks” given in Daniel 9 had passed, so people were looking for the Messiah. At precisely the 10th day of Nisan Jesus rode in to Jerusalem on an unbroken colt of a donkey. This was the sign given in Zechariah 9:9 so the people gathered and shouted “Hosanna” which means “save us, we pray”. They meant “save us from the evil Roman rule.” But instead Jesus went into the temple and overturned the merchants tables and caused a commotion. This was the final straw for the Jews. Not only did he claim he was God, he forgave sins, he was doing miracles on sabbath, he also rejected the Talmud as being only the traditions of men. Through a sham trial he was tortured, flogged, crucified, killed and buried. That should have been the end of the story, but to be sure the disciples would not come and steal the body and say he was resurrected the Jews put up a guard to protect the tomb with their lives.

The end of the story is that Jesus did resurrect, proving the resurrection prophecy true, and that changed the world. Under the old covenant the holy spirit came upon the prophet as God spoke through him. Under the new covenant the Holy Spirit takes residence as they repent and believe. Initially it is only the new covenant with Israel.

But then it will speak about “his neighbor.” This is all mankind. The new covenant is for Jews, Christians, Muslims and even Hindus, Buddhists, Chinese and all people. There is now a great revival and awakening occurring i the world. Young people are coming to Christ in ever increasing numbers. In Iran there were maybe a handful domestic believers 60 years ago. Now there are over a million. Muslims all over the world have dreams about Jesus and have come to believe. In China there are probably more than 70 million believers. It is a worldwide awakening.

Isaiah 17, the Burden against Damascus,

Damascus was famous since Roman times for their swords. They were forged from an iron ore imported from India containing Tungsten and Vanadium and carbonized using leaves rather than charcoal. Around 1750 the ore was exhausted and many have tried to reproduce the sword forging, none able  to duplicate it. It seems that the ore also contained carbon nanotubes making it exceedingly flexible and forge-able making them the sharp enough to split a hair.

Damascus is the oldest city that has never been destroyed. For this reason Isaiah has been questioned as a Prophet, since it has not happened yet. Yet today Damascus is in the news again.

Some years ago, then Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi visited Damascus to make diplomacy with Syria against the will of the State Department. What was she really doing?

She, an American infidel (Roman Catholic) woman was doing the sign of the cross inside the Ummayid Mosque. To her credit, she wore a proper hijab. Diplomacy at its best.

The destruction has begun, but the total destruction overnight is yet to happen.

This siege did not finish off Damascus.

Isaiah 13, a prophecy against Babylon.

Chapter 13 through 24 are a series of prophesies of disasters for all kinds of places and Peoples.  Babylon will take Israel into captivity.

Today is no different. This time people are fleeing the area. Hostilities are again increasing.

The city of Babylon was not very big, but it controlled a large territory.

The Day of the LORD as described in Matthew 24

Same account according to St. Mark in the old Wycliffe translation from around 1390 modified into modern language.

 

The ruins of Babylon are being restored, before the Mid-east War Saddam Hussein wanted to make it a historical Disneyland. The four pictures below show Baghdad today. The upper left picture shows one of Saddam Hussein’s many palaces overlooking the old ruin City of Babylon.

Was Muhammad “the Prophet” or even a Prophet?

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

The quote comes from a speech that President Obama delivered to the United Nations General Assembly on 25 September 2012 about the death of U.S. ambassador Chris Stevens and three others in an attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. At that time he still blamed a video.

Muslims claim, and the religion of Islam demands that Muhammad was “The Prophet”. This claim comes from what Muhammad called “the Book”, Deuteronomy 18: 17-22

17 The Lord said to me (Moses) : “What they say is good. 18 I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their fellow Israelites, and I will put my words in his mouth. He will tell them everything I command him. 19 I myself will call to account anyone who does not listen to my words that the prophet speaks in my name. 20 But a prophet who presumes to speak in my name anything I have not commanded, or a prophet who speaks in the name of other gods, is to be put to death.”

21 You may say to yourselves, “How can we know when a message has not been spoken by the Lord?” 22 If what a prophet proclaims in the name of the Lord does not take place or come true, that is a message the Lord has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously, so do not be alarmed.

After Muhammad fled from Mecca to Medina he started to proclaim he was “The Prophet” His new followers wanted to make sure he was “the Prophet” so they asked the Jews. The Jews immediately answered “No, he is not The Prophet. The Prophet must be an Israelite, and Muhammad is an Ishmaelite, so he is an impostor”. That didn’t sit well with Muhammad, so he ordered his followers to start praying to Mecca instead of praying to Jerusalem, as had been their practice until then. His always cooperating archangel provided a convenient revelation that that was indeed so. Since then Muslims have prayed to Mecca instead of Jerusalem, and been on the warpath against the Jews.

So, Muhammad was not “The Prophet”. Was he even a Prophet?

Everything a prophet proclaims must come true for him to qualify as a Prophet. One miss, and you are out. One prophecy Muhammad claimed was that the Jews would never be a unified nation again, and that they would not be able to fight militarily against the Muslims.

They [the Jewish people] will not fight you (even) together, except in fortified townships, or from behind walls. Strong is their fighting (spirit) amongst themselves: thou wouldst think they were united, but their hearts are divided: that is because they are a people devoid of wisdom.” (Surah 59:14).

The seven day war and other wars since the formation of Israel in 1948 proves this prophecy wrong. (The opposite of what was prophecised has occurred)

Logic demands that Muhammad was not a prophet.

The Muslims have chosen another explanation: Israel does not exist, will never exist,  has no right to exist and all fighting that has occurred in the Mideast can be explained by other means. There never was a genocide of Armenians, the holocaust never occurred and so forth.

After President Anwar Sadat of Egypt signed the peace accord with Israel together with Begin and President Carter, he was promptly assassinated by the Muslim Brotherhood.

It is my opinion that the only solution possible for peace in the Middle East is a reformation of the Muslim faith, accepting the violent history of Islam, its slavery and oppression, abandoning all physical claims to future world dominance, separating out the spiritual claims, and abandoning their geographical dreams of physically conquering the world. There are plenty of Muslims here in the USA willing to work towards that goal, but unfortunately they are not accepted by President Obama, who still prefers to work with the Muslim Brotherhood and their affiliates.